Hi user1234, hello to the Community!
First of all a big thanks to @wandererfan for the speed in fixing the problem, there is no doubt that for us good connoisseurs/lovers of FreeCad ("FreeCaddisti") it is not a problem, as we know we are used to work around problems /much greater limits, but as I said in the previous reply, the problem can baffle the neophyte technical user (who is very demanding as he uses the yardstick)/industry/school/crafts, etc. ( a little less the enthusiast who evaluates it for a "light/personal" use) who is trying, to evaluate a possible (functional and economic) "alternative", perhaps even an operating system to Linux.
We have a duty (!) to avoid that FreeCad should, under any circumstances, become/be a tool evaluated as a very "cumbersome", complicated and imprecise "niche" tool, or to be branded as "the usual free applications without any reliability" for which it is not worth wasting your time.
Good day and good work