user1234 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:10 am
Only one point of the meeting here is claimed (i do not konw how many the had, ...
OK may be you haven't read the complete "meeting minutes" reported by uwestoehr. Here follows a copy of it:
Outcome:
- @realthunder will post in this thread what he will do to add more info to the XML output in order to make the XML files better human-readable
- After this change has been made, @realthunder will add the toponaming feature to PartDesign
- then there will be the second release of a toponaming branch build
- about 2 weeks after this release we will meet again to decide the process how to merge toponaming into the master branch
So there was 4 points (not very many). But only the first two deal with techical aspects. And only the first of the two is really new.
In fact we alredy know about the need to add the toponaming code for PartDesign.
Here there are two possibilities
1) There where (possibly many) more points discussed in the meeting which were not reported in the minutes.
2) This is the correct list of points.
If the first one were true I would anyway conclude that this meeting were bad managed.
But, having a positive attitude, I prefere to think that the second is true, that is that this is the true list. The first point in the list is the only one with new technical content that was discussed (without mutual comprehension) in meeting.
I may understand that are different languages and ... But how may then uwestoehr say that that the meeting was so fruitful that any further technical discussion should be dealt in this kind of (babele) meeting refusing to accept any opinion expressed directly in this forum.