Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Contributions from the participants, questions and answers to their projects.
Discussions of proposals for upcoming events.
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
User avatar
Suraj Dadral
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by Suraj Dadral »

balrobs wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:18 pm However selecting a lateral face of the beam I expected the reinforcement to be laid in trasversal direction ... it happened that way except for the rebar marked in red in the below picture.
Hi @balrobs

I tried reproducing above, but surprisingly it works fine for me (as in below models). :o
May you please share the sample model with above issue and FreeCAD version info.

My FreeCAD info:
OS: Kali GNU/Linux Rolling (GNOME/gnome)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.19.22756 (Git) AppImage
Build type: Release
Branch: master
Hash: ce87f586ee36ffe8ebcdcd3947ced4ab389ae795
Python version: 3.8.6
Qt version: 5.12.5
Coin version: 4.0.0
OCC version: 7.4.0
Locale: English/India (en_IN)

Thanks,
Attachments
beam1.FCStd
(333.6 KiB) Downloaded 102 times
beam2.FCStd
(427.96 KiB) Downloaded 101 times
beam3.FCStd
(385.38 KiB) Downloaded 97 times
dwire_beam1.FCStd
(324.73 KiB) Downloaded 126 times
balrobs
Posts: 449
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:58 pm

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by balrobs »

Suraj Dadral wrote: Sat Oct 24, 2020 8:29 am I tried reproducing above, but surprisingly it works fine for me (as in below models). :o
Hi @Suraj,
Sorry for not posting my system info :mrgreen:
I encountered the issue on my windows system. I'm not able to reproduce the issue on my Ubuntu system, so I will give it another try at Monday when I will be back on my windows machine.
Cheers!

Code: Select all

OS: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (ubuntu:GNOME/ubuntu)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.19.
Build type: Release
Branch: unknown
Hash: 1062b6ee0f90ae197bc816aebf4dcf1b1646aa30
Python version: 3.8.5
Qt version: 5.12.8
Coin version: 4.0.0
OCC version: 7.3.0
Locale: English/United States (en_US)
balrobs
Posts: 449
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:58 pm

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by balrobs »

Hi @Suraj,
Back to my window machine I tried all steps done last week to reproduce the issue ... without success. It works as it should and unfortunately I didn't save the culprit file. Maybe i created and deleted the reinforcement several times and forgot to delete underlying sketches.
Sorry for wasting your time :|
Cheers
User avatar
Suraj Dadral
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by Suraj Dadral »

balrobs wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:10 am Back to my window machine I tried all steps done last week to reproduce the issue ... without success. It works as it should and unfortunately I didn't save the culprit file. Maybe i created and deleted the reinforcement several times and forgot to delete underlying sketches.
Sorry for wasting your time :|
Thanks @balrobs for testing and confirmation about the same. Happy to see Beam Reinforcement is working fine. :D
User avatar
Suraj Dadral
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by Suraj Dadral »

jtm2020hyo wrote: Fri Oct 23, 2020 11:55 am I am interested in this feature, any date for release it with the dev version?
Hi @jtm2020hyo

Is it about the same issue reparted by balrobs. Or may you please mention in which feature you are interested. :)

Thanks,
jtm2020hyo
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 1:24 am

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by jtm2020hyo »

Well, for Christmas I wish :

Similar features to Robot Structural Analysis, automatic RC Design, 3D grid, create animations, automatic footing design, add soil type to the variables, IFC import export, support for Pipe interference, add Risk Management Classes, a guide for pre design Columns and Beams, support for tower creation for lightning rod, add standard per country, manage the materials to connect the electrical grounding rod and mesh... All this for start.
jtm2020hyo
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 1:24 am

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by jtm2020hyo »

Excuse me, could create a option to use just lines, wires, polylines instead sketcher wb? This to create a workflow with external software exporting those lines
User avatar
Suraj Dadral
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by Suraj Dadral »

jtm2020hyo wrote: Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:19 pm Excuse me, could create a option to use just lines, wires, polylines instead sketcher wb? This to create a workflow with external software exporting those lines
Hi jtm2020hyo,

Do you mean same as in the thread: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... 6&p=471386
P.S. Replied there.

Thanks,
jtm2020hyo
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 1:24 am

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by jtm2020hyo »

thanks for the script, but I still think than is need an option to use all base container as Wires (3D polylines) and not Sketcher + 3D Lines + 3D arcs at the same time.
jtm2020hyo
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 1:24 am

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Post by jtm2020hyo »

Image

not sure but I think I found a possible bug, in the image I tried to create a reinforcement rebar column with 1-meter offset but was create inside the column when should be in the exterior, when I tried to change the column height, then the rebar changed their height to outside in the above part, but not below.
shape to wire .FCStd
(243.6 KiB) Downloaded 95 times
anyway is a nice tool.
Post Reply