Just for clarity, I don't think it "needs" to be removed given the current state of the tree-view, but changing it to a tool-tip style popup in my mind still seems like a better way to display such information.
Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
- sliptonic
- Veteran
- Posts: 3315
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:46 pm
- Location: Columbia, Missouri
- Contact:
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
With all due respect, @chrisb, I think we're pole-vaulting over mouse poop.
Take the stupid thing out and if users complain (a lot) put it back in.
Better yet, take the time to understand why a user wants it and make an even better feature.
The way to have a more efficient user interface isn't to avoid making mistakes. It's to iterate faster!! Try stuff. Learn something and move on.
User interface shouldn't be about avoiding every possible criticism, it should be about trying out new ideas fast and throwing away the bad ones.
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
You may be right with the mouse poop, and I will not insist on keeping it, because I used these fields only very few times myself. But I have seen some models here, where it was used extensively, and seeing it I thought "wow, that's a well documented project", of course accompanied by the less comfortable feeling that I should do more with my own projects.
(These models where not about the field discussed here and I see no chance to find them.)
So let's tackle it from the other side: We all know that well documented (bigger) projects are good projects. The questions arising are
1) Should additional information be held in the FreeCAD file?
2) If so, where should it be stored.
I have for myself a directory for each project, where I may have a README file with extended information, usually not per tree entry, but rather something like the math behind, printer settings, machine setups, where to by the wood, ...
Finally it may be interesting, that there was recently a discussion about adding information to individual sketcher constraints.
A Sketcher Lecture with in-depth information is available in English, auf Deutsch, en français, en español.
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
I often thought about the use of Label2 and description and I have never realised that the are connected.

I would have used it quite frequently if I only knew. I've had a look at the Tree view Wiki page and couldn't find description of this connection.

Instead of removing the Description column, I'd prefer to be able to edit Label2 directly in the Tree view, a menu entry "Description" under "Rename" at least. And a better visible documentation of the connection between Label2 and the Description column in the Wiki
Edit: Wiki is updated. Maybe @Roy_043 likes to fine-tune...

Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
Not sure if fine-tuning is the correct term, but I have made an edit.
- MisterMaker
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:41 am
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
Tell me your secrets!?
- adrianinsaval
- Veteran
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:15 pm
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
you can edit the description in the tree view but it's not very intuitive, you have to click on that field then press F2FBXL5 wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 6:29 am Instead of removing the Description column, I'd prefer to be able to edit Label2 directly in the Tree view, a menu entry "Description" under "Rename" at least. And a better visible documentation of the connection between Label2 and the Description column in the Wiki
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
That doesn't work on my MacBookadrianinsaval wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 9:20 pm you can edit the description in the tree view but it's not very intuitive, you have to click on that field then press F2

- adrianinsaval
- Veteran
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:15 pm
Re: Headers in Treeview could we remove them?
Try using whatever is the normal shortcut for renaming something in macOS