[Ongoing] Testing Toponaming in upstream FreeCAD

[mfro]

Found the "Sketcher_SwapGeometryID" function in the Toponaming branch.

What does it do and why would I use it?

[Kunda1]

Found the "Sketcher_SwapGeometryID" function in the Toponaming branch.

What does it do and why would I use it?

can you specify lines in the source?

[mfro]

Found the "Sketcher_SwapGeometryID" function in the Toponaming branch.

What does it do and why would I use it?

can you specify lines in the source?

I didn't check (yet). I was referring to the additional Icon/Function in Sketcher Workbench.

[obelisk79]

Greetings,

Is there an updated status on the progress of the final PR adding the Part Design integration? It's been quite some time and I've been waiting for this before testing as it's a significant part of my primary work flow.

Regards,
Joe

[realthunder]

Found the "Sketcher_SwapGeometryID" function in the Toponaming branch.

What does it do and why would I use it?

It lets you swap the internal names of the geometries, in order to reduce chance of model breaking in later steps. See this post for and example.

[realthunder]

Greetings,

Is there an updated status on the progress of the final PR adding the Part Design integration? It's been quite some time and I've been waiting for this before testing as it's a significant part of my primary work flow.

Regards,
Joe

The team agree to make formal release for the toponaming branch in its current state first (very soon). And if no major problems reported by other developers, then I'll add the PartDesign patch.

[drmacro]

Greetings,

Is there an updated status on the progress of the final PR adding the Part Design integration? It's been quite some time and I've been waiting for this before testing as it's a significant part of my primary work flow.

Regards,
Joe

The team agree to make formal release for the toponaming branch in its current state first (very soon). And if no major problems reported by other developers, then I'll add the PartDesign patch.

Does this imply that some or all of the TNP mitigation should work in a Part workbench situation?

This movie shows my test with PArt WB with the build shown below:

TopoPart.gif (427.13 KiB) Viewed 9030 times

Code: Select all

OS: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (XFCE/lightdm-xsession)
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.21.29382 +77 (Git)
Build type: Release
Branch: development/toponaming
Hash: 5cc0693e61b9b547cc26404604ea6c1c883a6435
Python 3.9.2, Qt 5.15.2, Coin 4.0.0, Vtk 7.1.1, OCC 7.7.0.dev
Locale: English/United States (en_US)
Installed mods: 
  * parts_library
  * kicadStepUpMod 10.16.5
  * Manipulator 1.4.9
  * PrefExtras
  * QuickMeasure
  * MyDefaults 2022.9.15
  * ZolkoBase 0.0.1
  * DynamicData 2.46.0
  * fasteners 0.4.19
  * MacMechX 2022.9.15
  * ExtremeProDark 2.3.3
  * ProDarkThemePreferencePack 1.0.0
  * fcgear 1.0.0
  * plugins
  * Pyramids-and-Polyhedrons
  * Defeaturing 1.2.0
  * Assembly4 0.12.4
  * BaseTest 0.0.1
  * OpticsWorkbench 1.0.9
  * workfeature-macro
  * sheetmetal 0.2.58
  * A2plus 0.4.59e
  * CurvedShapes 1.0.4
  * BasicMech 0.0.1
  * Dracula 0.0.2
  * Curves 0.5.12
  * workfeature
  * lattice2 1.0.0

[wsteffe]

This movie shows my test with PArt WB with the build shown below:

And what is it supposed to demonstrate ?

[drmacro]

This movie shows my test with PArt WB with the build shown below:

And what is it supposed to demonstrate ?

...the sketch for the olive block is attached to the top surface of the green block. Change the sketch of the green block and the olive block is now attached to the bottom surface of the green block.

[adrianinsaval]

please use webp or some other video format, gif is very hard to follow because there's no start/end reference.