0.19.1 Tag?

Here's the place for discussion related to coding in FreeCAD, C++ or Python. Design, interfaces and structures.
User avatar
Kunda1
Veteran
Posts: 13443
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:03 pm

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by Kunda1 »

uwestoehr wrote: Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:06 pm
Kunda1 wrote: Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:23 pm 1) text for https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/releases/tag/0.19
my proposal:

Code: Select all

This is the official 0.18.1 release of FreeCAD.

This release is also the first one with official binaries for the FreeCAD 0.19 release series.

FreeCAD 0.19 brings a huge set of improvements, please have a look at its release notes to find out what:
https://wiki.freecadweb.org/Release_notes_0.19

FreeCAD.0_19_1.Offline.Doc.7z is compressed version of the FreeCAD offline documentation.
FreeCAD.0_19_1.Quick.Reference.Guide.7z is a compressed version of the FreeCAD Quick Reference Guide
Unzip them with a 7zip utility.
Thanks, though the real 0.19 is 0.19.1 so we should reference that as well, right ?
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
User avatar
Kunda1
Veteran
Posts: 13443
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:03 pm

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by Kunda1 »

uwestoehr wrote: Sat Mar 20, 2021 11:02 pm
looo wrote: Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:37 pm Regarding the qt Assistent: did this work in the past (0.19 pre builds)?
Why do we ship it? Is this used for the "What's this" feature? If yes, then it worked on Windows also for the 0.19 pre builds.
Yes, we use it for the What's this and reading the documentation through the Help menu. Note: IIRC there is/(was?) an upstream issue regarding Qt Assistant that malfunctioned in a certain way (and was OS specific?). Need to dig to find it.

Edit: issue #3960 regarding the AppImage
links to:
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD-AppImage/issues/25
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-12050
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
User avatar
looo
Veteran
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:29 pm

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by looo »

I tested the help functionality of the appimage and it doesn't work for me. There is no help-panel appearing but also no error reported, so difficult to see what's wrong.

Also for the osx bundle the assistant is still can't be started although manually included in the dmg.

So should we exclude the help files?
User avatar
mpetrasinovic
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2020 10:19 am
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Contact:

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by mpetrasinovic »

I have a problem (no AddonManager) with the release described in https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=47095

It works as expected in:

OS: Windows 10 (10.0)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.19.24276 (Git)
Build type: Release
Branch: (HEAD detached at 0.19.1)
Hash: a88db11e0a908f6e38f92bfc5187b13ebe470438
Python version: 3.8.8
Qt version: 5.12.9
Coin version: 4.0.0
OCC version: 7.4.0
Locale: English/United States (en_US)
Syres
Veteran
Posts: 2497
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:14 am

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by Syres »

Yep, so the 0.19.1 build and installer needs the same renaming of ssl.py to ssl-orig.py and the corrected ssl.py copying over which contains (amongst other changes)

Code: Select all

# Workaround see https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=47095
at line 92 to help distinguish between them as is the case with the Conda builds.


sgrogan wrote: ping
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4960
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by uwestoehr »

Syres wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:06 pm Yep, so the 0.19.1 build and installer needs the same renaming of ssl.py to ssl-orig.py and the corrected ssl.py copying over which contains
I am now confused because with the Windows installer and the LibPack builds everything works fine. Only the Conda builds are affected.

So to understand, when you installed FC using the FC 0.19.1 Windows installer, you cannot use "What's this"? If so, please test if it works with the Part WB toolbar icons, since there is a bug in FC that "What's this" fails for the Std WB.
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4960
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by uwestoehr »

uwestoehr wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:31 pm there is a bug in FC that "What's this" fails for the Std WB.
Here is the forum thread for this issue: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=56891
Syres
Veteran
Posts: 2497
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:14 am

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by Syres »

uwestoehr wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:31 pm I am now confused because with the Windows installer and the LibPack builds everything works fine. Only the Conda builds are affected.

So to understand, when you installed FC using the FC 0.19.1 Windows installer, you cannot use "What's this"? If so, please test if it works with the Part WB toolbar icons, since there is a bug in FC that "What's this" fails for the Std WB.
My reply was regarding the fault @mpetrasinovic reported with AddonManager, absolutely nothing to do with What's This or Toolbars.

I pinged @sgrogan because he added a line towards the end of the Conda Builds batch file several months ago to replace the standard ssl.py file with my modified one and so I thought if there's an existing batch file used with the release 0.19.1 it could be added there also.

The whole root cause is due to Serbia Republic Certificates cause a fault and need to be ignored. This has to be done early in the FreeCAD loading stage way before the user clicks on AddonManager.

Sorry for the confusion.
User avatar
sgrogan
Veteran
Posts: 6501
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by sgrogan »

Syres wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:16 pm I pinged @sgrogan because he added a line towards the end of the Conda Builds batch file several months ago to replace the standard ssl.py file with my modified one and so I thought if there's an existing batch file used with the release 0.19.1 it could be added there also.
I will add the patch for ssl.py to the Libpack and rebuild the installer.
"fight the good fight"
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4960
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 0.19.1 Tag?

Post by uwestoehr »

sgrogan wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:08 pm I will add the patch for ssl.py to the Libpack and rebuild the installer.
Can you please also inform @apeltauer that he includes this in the LibPack?
Post Reply