thanks @onekk, I really understand a lot more of how the FCStd format works
yorik wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 10:10 am
This thread is going really fast and far
Well, that's good!
Regarding "working in 2D". Don't know about you guys, but I really dislike "working in 2D views" like in Revit. This seems to me a gross way to try to make "old-school" architects feel at ease in a 3D application by "faking" that they are working in their favourite old-school CAD program.
I'm really convinced that it's not like this. 2d it's not something old school just because it's 1D less than 3D.
2D it's more conceptual. It's simplified. It's straightforward. It helps to improve the control of the 3d model. I do not think that It's something old fashoned. And I do not think that providing a decent 2d experience has anything to do with trying to mimic some other softwares.
And for 2D I do not mean something far from the 3d space, in a different place, or worse, just an output, but the possibility to work with a 2d view INSIDE the 3d space, and in 3d!
But that's just my opinion. Maybe i'm just living in a
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland.
I call our world Flatland, not because we call it so, but to make its nature clearer to you, my happy readers, who are privileged to live in Space.