I don't have time ATM to handle this, but the magic happens here : https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/blob ... p#L82-L147
Specifically, line width is on line 121.
I don't have time ATM to handle this, but the magic happens here : https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/blob ... p#L82-L147
Please stop ever complaining that nobody cares about or likes you or your holly WB. This is boring and doesn't help. Why it isn't in the core? Because you didn't make a PR.
No need to get grumpy. From what your describe is your stuff really good, but it would already be less good, if there were two or more ways to build equivalent stuff. The other developers - you know there aren't that many - probably don't have the time to integrate it, so openBrain is right: you should do it yourself. That would also reveal if there are flaws in the concept and you can eliminate them immediately.
It's getting out of topic, but I checked your workbench Design456 and it seems to have a lot of tools and functionalities but I can't understand what is the goal of your workbench, what is it for? Who use it? To make what kind of things?
well this is kind of a chicken and egg situation... people using FreeCAD and lurking in the forums probably don't care much about direct modelling because they're here for the parametric capabilities, this is because FreeCAD was created as a parametric CAD software, not a direct modelling one. Unless a mature enough and good enough direct modelling workbench is around FreeCAD is unlikely to attract direct modelling folks and because of this, not many people will join you until it gets there. And this last part is total wild speculation but IMO it's unlikely that people using direct modelling will be interested in programming, they're using direct modelling stuff because they like easy tu use simple and graphical tools, not powerful complex scripting stuff... So I think you should better manage your expectations from this project and this community.But seems that no one care of my WB unfortunately which is sad.
Merged by @wmayer as revision 27101openBrain wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:30 pm First step here to allow selection with full bounding box of labels rather than precisely picking inside the font : https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/5396
ATM, changing line to be thicker will happen in all situations (plane selection, but also simple origin display). Is that acceptable ? If it isn't, it would need to introduce a mechanism to have hot change depending on the situation.adrianinsaval wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:53 pm niiiice that's probably the most helpful part but thicker lines would be appreciated too I think.
Not sure of this one.And a visual representation of the label bounding box would also be nice to have IMO.
As this thread isn't closed on all points, better open a new topic to not clutter.Kinda related thought: what do you guys think of making datum planes more like this instead of having a fully filled rectangle? Currently they are too obstructive to make it practical to have them shown in 3D view so I always hide them, even if I know I will use the plane again later.